Judging the Art and Olfaction Awards is the most important part to get right. Without a healthy judging mechanism, our efforts would be pointless. For that reason, we take the judging process very seriously, and take our time with it. Judging takes place, typically, over five months, with three stages of assessment.
To guard against favoritism and bias, judging at the Art and Olfaction Awards is anonymized. Submissions are assessed blindly in the artisan and independent category, as well as in the Newcomer Award. All submissions in these categories are tracked by a number, accompanied only by a short, anonymized creative brief that describes the intention for the scent.
The judges for the experimental award category do not review the projects blindly. This is because the projects often require supporting visual material, which often contain identifying information. We also ask our judges to adhere to a code of ethics,
Please read on for more about our judging process.
The judging process for winners and finalist perfumes is conducted with the utmost care. Judging is carried out blindly, focusing solely on the scent and a short and anonymized creative brief. The identity of the submitted perfumes— including branding, naming, perfumer, creative director, country of origin, cost, and marketing approach—is concealed from the judges. This ensures that evaluations are based on the olfactory experience alone, and that the outcomes are determined by the fragrance's inherent qualities.
To reiterate: Non-olfactory aspects (including branding, design, marketing strategies, personal statements, political beliefs, opinions, social media presence, etc.) are not assessed. As such, any statements or beliefs expressed by the finalists and winners do not reflect the personal values or opinions of the organizers of the awards—or the personal values or opinions of the judges.

The first step to a fair judging process is selecting thoughtful people to judge, who bring a unique perspective and experience to the job. This is a voluntary endeavor that is engaged with as a service to the community. Judges are not renumerated for their time.
We ask each judge to sign off on our code of ethics, which states the principles of how we run the awards.
Please respect our judges' time and privacy—and the integrity of the awards—by refraining from contacting the judges about your submission.

The artisan and independent categories are judged blindly in three rounds.
Preliminary Round
In the preliminary round, the judges gather to assess their grouping of submissions. These are in blind vials, accompanied by an anonymized creative brief.
The judges have as many sessions as they need to adequately assess the samples, and are instructed to revisit each sample several times, including during the dry-down.
It’s hard work, but each judge pays particular attention to giving every submission an impartial assessment, according to our instructions. Each judge smells up to 150 perfumes, and all perfumes are assessed by at least 3 different judges.
Once all judges have assessed and scored the perfumes, their scores combine to produce the top fifty highest-scoring perfumes in each category (artisan and indie). These go on to our semi-finalist round.

Semi-Finalist Round
The top fifty scoring submissions in the artisan and independent categories are sent in anonymized vials (along with their creative briefs) to our semi-finalist judges, who assign them with a score. These scores are averaged to produce the five runner-ups and ten finalists in each category. These perfumes go on to the third and final round.
Finalist Round
For the finalist round, we send the ten finalists in each category in anonymized vials, along with their creative briefs. The finalist judges are asked to assign a score to each perfume. Their scores determine the two winners in each category.

The Newcomer Award has a separate jury. These judges are provided with the ten top qualifying fragrances from the preliminary round in the artisan and independent categories.
These submissions are sent to the judges in anonymized vials, and accompanied by the submission's creative brief.

The judging process for the Sadakichi Award is very similar to the artisan and independent categories, except that the judges are aware of the project name, and have the opportunity to view supporting materials—which often include images, video, or sound.
As with the other categories, the Sadakichi Award judges are asked to score the submissions numerically. These scores are averaged to provide a list of five finalists and one winner. If consensus is not clear, the judges convene for a discussion to establish the winner.
It is very important to us that the judging be as fair and consistent as possible, with maximum respect given to the excellent work that the perfume community has entrusted to us.
If you have any questions or suggestions on how to do this better, we are all ears.
The Art and Olfaction Awards and the Golden Pears™ are a program of The Institute for Art and Olfaction. All rights reserved.
Be kind, be cool. be honest, have fun.
©2026
Cooking help us analyze website traffic and optimize your experience. Your data is aggregated with all other user data.